So when can we IMPEACH Members of Congress for Fiduciary Irresponsibility? It is an Impeachable offense as defined by Constitutional Law, if removed from Office by Impeachment Members will not get their "sweetheart" Pensions and Healthcare..just raising the question!

Here we go again-you're going after the hard working State Employees and their Retirement. How about looking at those in the House and Senate who gets a better package than we do? The System was ranked #1 a few years ago until the House and the Senate put their grubby hands into it. How much more does the State employees endure considering Furloughs, and Retirement? Handle the House and Senate, cut their entitlements, cut their PORK-BARREL spending, leave the State employees alone!! We work so we can retire! Some retire after 20-years and Law-Enforcement have to wait 25-years before retiring!

What does your husband know about Law Enforcement? You appointed him to oversee the selection of the Head of SLED. That was wrong, you are the head of this State. What you did was against Policy, and falls under Nepotism. You can't supervise your immediate family. How can you justify this decision? State employees know this Policy. Why is it you don't?

Blue Cross Blue Shield should not have a seat on our states health care panel,what say you?

You said a mouthfull. BC&BS shouldn't have a seat. Just proves what I always thought. They are a monopoly n this State. The price for BC&BS has gone up, with benefits not covering what they used to when I was working for the State. Even the deductible went up. Their is no compitition with Health in this State because they have the State House on their side and not to mention lobbyist. You'd think that the powers that be would help the State employees.

You said a mouthfull. BC&BS shouldn't have a seat. Just proves what I always thought. They are a monopoly n this State. The price for BC&BS has gone up, with benefits not covering what they used to when I was working for the State. Even the deductible went up. Their is no compitition with Health in this State because they have the State House on their side and not to mention lobbyist. You'd think that the powers that be would help the State employees.

You sat on the fence with Amazon and 1200+ jobs. Then you laid in bed with Wal-Mart and 400+ jobs. Which will hurt small buisnesses more than Amazon. Which would mean more Wal-marts in every county and soon every town in S.C. Why are they more important? Was there money involved with your decision? Why can't you answer questions from the News Media? Why are you so evassive?

I see you've still not responded to my querry as of yet! I'm going to pose to you another querry;'how can you still cut the Department of Corrections and again give Furloughs, give extra Furlough days to the Supervisors (who run the prison) and cut the pay for those who make $40,000-a-year? Why didn't move on up the line, instead of messing with the ones who are in the trenches each day and being assaulted?

Were you aware that 50 people have to agree with you before anyone from Tell.DC will respond? sad but true.

Why is Ryberg bring up Retirement when there is more important matters to focus on(?) The retirement systems were and have been solvent before the Legislature started messing with it. Why are the State employees making $35,000 having to take extra furlough days instead of the heads that make $70,000 and up not taking a pay cut and furlough(?) Leave the reirement systems alone. They were first in the nation.